Search for: "Samuel Harms" Results 221 - 240 of 1,111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 8:05 am by Sherry F. Colb
I knew that I could not take on the entire issue in 600-800 words, so I decided to focus on Samuel Alito's (SA's) complete failure to consider the costs in pain and risk and hardship that pregnancy--and especially unwanted pregnancy--entails. [read post]
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the dissent joined by Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:50 am by Sherry F. Colb
In Justice Samuel Alito's (SA's) opinion for the Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
Cogdill, 21-783Issues: (1) Whether jail officials who are subjectively aware of a substantial risk that a pretrial detainee will attempt suicide and respond to the harm unreasonably may be held liable when their violation was obvious — as the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Kyle Hulehan
The carbon tax has twin benefits: in addition to reducing the long-run costs of climate change, the revenue can be used to lower other, more economically harmful taxes. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by John Elwood
Perez then sued under the ADA to obtain money damages for past harm, which the IDEA did not provide for. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
" Sir Matthew Hale (MH), a British jurist from the seventeenth century with a starring role in Samuel Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:06 am by Jolynn Dellinger, Stephanie Pell
The letter is a response to Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs, which foreshadows the overturning of Roe and the subsequent banning and criminalization of abortion by many states. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a dissenting opinion that referenced but did not endorse the Texas attorney general’s defense of the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Samuel Antill and Megan Hunter
The negative consumer response to corporate bankruptcies that we document harms bankrupt firms, which lose market share, and consumers, who may have benefitted from a bankrupt firm’s products. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In the abortion context, that argument has special urgency, because the more aggressively this Court moves, the more women will be harmed. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But because the woman is a person and the zygote/embryo/fetus is not, one must rescue the woman from her serious health problem by expelling the harmful tissue. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
There is thus nothing problematic about the Chief Justice or other Justices being upset about this leak or wishing to deter future leaks.The InvestigationThe difficulty is that the leak investigation seems to be intensifying the very harm that the leak itself presents. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But as the nation reckons with a pair of deadly mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde, Texas, some are warning these photos and videos are harmful and glorify the use and ownership of firearms designed to kill. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Ben Sperry
Meanwhile, Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissent that was joined by fellow conservatives Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, and liberal Justice Elena Kagan also dissented without offering a written justification. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:18 pm by Amy Howe
The other three conservatives (Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch) and one liberal justice (Elena Kagan) dissented. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:20 am by Karen Tani
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Samuel Alito dismissed the Equal Protection Clause as an alternative ground of the abortion right, citing an amicus brief in which we advanced that argument. [read post]