Search for: "Samuel Morales"
Results 221 - 240
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 12:58 pm
Justice Samuel Alito worried aloud that, if the “general rule” were that a defendant can’t be convicted if he believed that his actions were moral, it would result in a “revolutionary change” to criminal law. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:40 am
Everything from John Cotton on religious intolerance to Elizabeth Cady Stanton on free speech to Benjamin Tucker on individualism to Samuel Gompers on immigration to William James on the moral equivalent of war. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia is an immigration attorney, Samuel Weiss Faculty Scholar and founding director of the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Penn State Law – University Park. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:50 pm
Samuel Rowe is a student at the University of Oxford. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener: Reuel… [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 7:35 am
"How is it," Samuel Johnson famously complained, "that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
” Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
Also in the VIP section are Martha-Ann Alito, the wife of Justice Samuel Alito, and Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen Breyer. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 am
” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court today, in an opinion that once again eschewed the use of the Lemon test. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
There is, I can sense them wailing, no reasoning with those beastly redemptivists, who for some misbegotten reason will not accept the Rawlsian methodology that takes the prejudices of Leftist Ivy-League faculty members as the polestars of moral and political theory. [read post]
13 May 2019, 9:35 am
MOTOR VEHICLES Samuel I. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:08 pm
The Jeffersonians impeached Associate Justice Samuel Chase so that judges would understand in no uncertain terms that political partisanship should have no place on the federal bench. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:47 am
" Samuel Smiles (1812–1904) published the first self-consciously personal-development "self-help" book—entitled Self-Help—in 1859. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
The overall rationale for the decision was that “speech may not be banned on the grounds that it expresses ideas that offend”, as remarked by Justice Samuel Alito (the mark was THE SLANTS, an Asian American dance rock band). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:59 am
At UCLA as elsewhere, pledges and obligatory statements about diversity threaten academic freedom [Robert Shibley, Minding the Campus, Paul Caron/TaxProf, Christian Schneider, New York Post, earlier] 2019, 1673, whatever: By calling ourselves “inclusive,” Cambridge explains, we mean “there is no place here for” those who fail to accept key tenets of faith and morals [Robby Soave] He “had just chosen to move from Australia, the country where he earned his… [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
Justice Samuel Alito asked whether the government’s interest is focused on preventing an association with particular words, or is based on a sense of the public’s morality. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:54 pm
Fiduciary Remedies, Samuel L. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
" Thus, contrary to Justice Scalia's claim, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause does not tie us to the specific moral standards of 1790. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
” Thus, contrary to Justice Scalia’s claim, the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause does not tie us to the specific moral standards of 1790. [read post]
