Search for: "Sands v. Harms"
Results 221 - 240
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
This case is William Beaumont Hospital v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The Sand Island plant will need to be upgraded by 2035, but could be extended to 2038 based on a showing of economic hardship. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
“The additional environmental projects included in the settlement will protect children, pregnant mothers, local residents and workers from harmful pollution and are an example of securing public health and environmental benefits in addition to those achieved by compliance with our nation’s environmental laws. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
On July 15, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Kyser v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:08 pm
The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
Sands v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
The latter crimes may be devastating in their harm, as here, but "in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public," Coker, 433 U. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Walker In California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The recent self-disclosure cases had potential penalties ranging from $18,900 to $192,400 for environmental violations that the agency determined caused no serious or actual harm to human health or the environment. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:34 pm
These are the very sorts of harm that tort law is designed to control. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:49 am
Bermuda Sands, Inc., No. 4530, 2009 WL 1037043, at *3 (S.C. [read post]
