Search for: "Saunders, Appeal of" Results 221 - 240 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
As an adolescent, he became devoted to the fiction of George Saunders, a writer with strong moral commitments whose idiosyncratic style (Saunders routinely makes up words) appealed to the autodidact in him. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:30 pm by Richard Burt
Troutman Saunders LLP, from the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court, shows the importance of not including unnecessary verbiage in a contract just because it’s traditional. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
On appeal the guidance counselor challenged the arbitrator's finding her guilty of several of the charges sustained against her that the court said were raised for the first time on appeal. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Using hearsay evidence in a disciplinary hearing Saunders v City of New York, App. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:19 am by Steve Hall
Saunders writes, "As Sacramento dawdles, DAs revolt. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 8:48 am by Kent Scheidegger
By administering a lethal dose of barbiturates, Ohio made it harder for frivolous appeals to keep the state from enforcing its laws. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am by Vikram Raghavan
S and the reasoning adopted by the Court of Appeal is of particular interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm by Law Lady
RUBY SAUNDERS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Walter Saunders, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police… [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:34 am by emagraken
Crouch, 2011 BCSC 1762, Saunders J. followed these general statements of principle, noting: [18] A breach of the Motor Vehicle Act is not in itself determinative of liability; all of the surrounding circumstances may be taken into account. [44] In my respectful view, given the provisions of the Negligence Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 333 and the facts that I have found, the defendants bear the greater liability. [read post]