Search for: "Savage v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:19 am by James Bickford
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:42 am by Amy Howe
” In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage looks ahead to United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
  This is not to suggest that the current cultural revolution in the United states (in particular) or in the liberal democratic camp (on general) ought to be faulted. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the decision “trumpeted the independence of the states. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ noted that he was reminded of a citation from an old case, Savage v Harris and Sons (1896) 13 RPC 364, which stated that “cases, so far as regards the law, are most useful, but when they are applied to particular facts, they, as a rule, are of little service. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague and whether a ruling to that effect would be retroactive. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]