Search for: "Save Benefits Inc. v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
GENIE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal combined solar power purchase … [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Ct. 2009). http://bit.ly/9iApZ1 United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
The importance of reduction to practice: (IP Directions),Realized IP strategy - it's what you did, not what you planned: (IP ThinkTank),Last chance to patent your patent valuation method: (IP ThinkTank),Does low-cost, volume-based patenting really save money? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Mikula v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
(Save Livermore Downtown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
But here, as the Court notes earlier, “The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
But here, as the Court notes earlier, “The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors.” In other words, the government only has a policy interest, not a property interest; “After the copyright has been granted,” said the Court, “the Government has no interest in any action under it save the general one that its laws… [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
