Search for: "Save Benefits Inc. v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
In last week’s order, the court only addressed the copying and distribution of Fox News clips to TVEyes subscribers — the service also allows subscribers to “save, archive, download, email, and share clips,” features that the court needs more evidence to rule on. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said, “The justices have set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm by Ayesha Khan
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
Eastern Shipping Worldwide, Inc., 35 AD3d 222, 222 [1st Dept 2006] ). [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as unsafe for  <> BTLaw Alert: EPA Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" - The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register soon, starting a 90-day comment period <> Supreme Court to Decide Whether CERCLA Statute Can Revive Otherwise Time-Barred Toxic Tort Suit - The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]