Search for: "Scott v. District of Columbia"
Results 221 - 240
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 11:53 am
Hilti, Inc., 703 F.3d 1206, 1229 (10th Cir. 2013), Scott v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am
Even for those providers that do serve the District of Columbia, AF Holdings’s discovery demands were overbroad because it made no attempt to limit its inquiry to those subscribers who might actually be located in the District. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
For instance, the PPACA defines “States” as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am
So too, inversely, with “anticanonical” texts like Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm
(Also, this morning the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Apple v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of Verizon, stating that the government can't force ISPs to adhere to net neutrality. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Scott Sia worked on the brief. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 10-1557 (PLF), 2013 WL 1881547, *11 (D.D.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Scott London and Bryan ShawCase number: 13-cv-02558 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: April 11, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 8, 2013 09/20/2013 12/19/2013 2013-80 SEC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:18 pm
Federal District Judge for the District of Columbia, Amy Berman Jackson, has granted summary judgment for the government in her opinion in Scott v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am
All that might be done would be to remove the federal agent from his position, and then prosecute him under state law, if he committed the offense in a state, or under the laws of a territory, such as the District of Columbia, if it occurred there, but not while he still remains a federal agent.There is one precedent, Bivens v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Doyle Scott Elliott, Scott Elliott, Inc., Michael J. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia last week relied on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to bar Texas from enforcing its photo ID requirement for voters in this fall’s election. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 4:30 pm
” At the same time, the Court’s holding in Scott v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
While denying his fellow Federalist William Marbury his commission as a justice of the peace of the District of Columbia—a commission issued by former Secretary of State John Marshall! [read post]
