Search for: "Seagate Technology"
Results 221 - 240
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
Computer-related technology is said to be the subject of over 90% of patent case filings in the district. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
Facilitating patent protection outside the United States for American technology will stimulate the export of American products produced by American workers. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:51 am
That is only one of the Read factors, but Seagate did not hold that it should be ignored. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
" The issue of willfulness was somewhat simpler - the plaintiff won the finding at trial, but after the jury verdict, but before the Court's hearing on the post-verdict motions, the Federal Circuit issued In Re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
The standard for establishing that a claim is "objectively baseless" under section 285 "is identical to the objective recklessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys' fees against an accused infringer for § 284 willful infringement actions under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The ruling also earned Hitachi and Excelstor some bragging rights over rivals Western Digital Corporation and Seagate Technologies, which both played it safe and settled similar suits with MagSil and co-plaintiff Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which exclusively licenses the patent to MagSil. 5. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The ruling also earned Hitachi and Excelstor some bragging rights over rivals Western Digital Corporation and Seagate Technologies, which both played it safe and settled similar suits with MagSil and co-plaintiff Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which exclusively licenses the patent to MagSil. 5. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included: European Commission launches consultation on ‘Content Online in the Single Market': (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IPR Helpdesk), UK government launches consultation on copyright exceptions: (IPKat), (Michael Geist), (IMPACT), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Out-Law), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), Cordis Corporation - US Court of Appeals… [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 7:56 am
Seagate (2007)—“Raised the bar for wilful infringement. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:43 am
Expands Electronic Discovery Processing Capacity - http://kuex.us/8715 ECA Performance - The Challenge Of Comparisons http://kuex.us/8630 EMC Offers Email Compliance App - http://kuex.us/8736 FT Report : Marsh & McLennan Seeking To Sell Kroll For $1.3 Bln - http://kuex.us/86f9 i365, (Seagate) Continues Momentum with EVault Cloud-Connected Services Platform, Signs ZL Technologies as ISV Partner - http://kuex.us/8642 IRON MOUNTAIN INC - FORM 10-K -… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
The decision rejects the objective-recklessness standard of Seagate (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:14 pm
The Court held that, under In re Seagate Tech, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
"The objective baselessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against a non-prevailing plaintiff under Brooks Furniture is identical to the objective recklessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against an accused infringer for § 284 willful infringement actions under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:24 pm
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., tried before Magistrate Judge John D. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
