Search for: "Seagate Technology"
Results 221 - 240
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 9:50 pm
New developments relating to the issue of privilege waiver in patent cases arise in In re Seagate Technology and inNilssen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
The defendant argued that after Seagate, opinion of counsel evidence was no longer relevant to the question of intent for inducing or contributory infringement. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm
As in our recent decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, we "leave it to future cases to further develop the application of this standard. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:01 pm
Very quietly, disc-drive giant Seagate Technology named a new general counsel: Ken Massaroni. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
Furthermore, citing Leapfrog Enterprises, the CAFC found that "adapting existing electronic processes to incorporate modern internet and web browser technology was similarly commonplace at the time the [] patent application was filed. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
First, on August 20, 2007, In re Seagate Technology, LLC changed the standard of willful infringement from one akin to negligence to that of objective recklessness. 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Newsweek has a fascinating article about a woman who makes her living as psychic to the corporations: When Seagate Technology, the $11 billion-a-year maker of hard drives for the Playstation 3 and Microsoft Xbox, went searching for a consultant to run one of its management workshops in the fall of 2006, it bypassed the usual list of Silicon Valley gurus. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 10:54 am
Plaintiff Trading Technologies (“TT”) argued that the case was exceptional. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:54 pm
Members of CFR include: Apple, Autodesk, Business Software Alliance, Chevron, Cisco Systems, Comcast, Dell, Electrolux, Google, Hewlett-Packard Company, Information Technology Industry Council, Intel, Micron Technology Inc., Microsoft, Oracle, Palm Inc., RIM, SAP, Seagate Technology, Symantec, TechNet, Time Warner and Visa. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
Beyond Innovation Technology and now Finisar v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
[1] On Monday, April 14th, Seagate Technology filed a patent infringement lawsuit against STEC. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:15 am
STEC issued a formal response to a patent infringement lawsuit filed by rival storage maker Seagate Technology and its subsidiaries. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:24 pm
Artesyn Technologies, Inc., tried before Magistrate Judge John D. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
" The issue of willfulness was somewhat simpler - the plaintiff won the finding at trial, but after the jury verdict, but before the Court's hearing on the post-verdict motions, the Federal Circuit issued In Re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (The Invent Blog),Brand promise and IP strategy: (IP ThinkTank),Cybersquatters have reached record numbers, says WIPO: (WIPO), (Ars Technica), (IPKat)Global - PatentsForbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz),More on Bessen and Meurer and their book ‘Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk’: (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
See In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
