Search for: "Service Life Insurance Company v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The new rules state that any employer can be exempted from the mandate based on its “sincerely held religious beliefs” or “moral convictions” that are inconsistent with providing insurance for contraceptive services. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
(in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-308 Case name: United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
The case presents two questions; the insurance company prevailed on both in the Second Circuit. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
To start at the beginning, the United States is based on a basic proposition: assume everyone who has power is likely to abuse it. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm
At least 22 states adopted MLTSS programs, which involve states hiring private managed care companies to deliver long-term care services. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Assets previously transferred to either health benefits or life insurance account in prior, qualified future transfer (and related income), which were not used as of the election effective date, are required to be transferred back to transferor plan within a reasonable [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 11:42 am
Yemen and Mauritius v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:44 am
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:14 pm
The Model State Structured Settlement Protection Act defines "discounted present value" to mean: "the present value of future payments determined by discounting such payments to the present using the most recently published Applicable Federal Rate for determining the present value of an annuity, as issued by the United States Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
According to the Walkers, the insects have severely damaged the home, and have caused the home to be subject to quarantine and possible destruction by the United States Department of Agriculture.In July 2011, the Walkers filed suit against BuildDirect and Fuzhou BuildDirect Limited, LLC (a Chinese company, which . . . was later voluntarily dismissed from the action) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, invoking… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Dean Foods Company v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
