Search for: "Shah v. Shah" Results 221 - 240 of 604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Writ of Mandamus2018 NY Slip Op 07694, Court of AppealsIn this action the Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division's dismissing the Plaintiffs' petition seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the New York City Police Department and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to enforce certain laws.The court explained that a writ of mandamus "is an extraordinary remedy 'that is available only in limited circumstances,'" citing Matter of County of… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This rule was summarised in the following terms by May LJ in Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241: “The repetition rule in its simplest application is that, if you publish a statement that Y said that X is guilty, it is not a defence to an action for defamation to establish the literal truth of the publication, ie that it is indeed true that Y said that X is guilty. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:25 am by First Mondays
Zinke, reflect on their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
Even if it’s a bit surprising that he said the quiet part out loud, it shouldn’t come as any great shock that Judge Brett Kavanaugh thinks the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:23 am by admin
” The Ohio Supreme Court reviewed the sudden medical emergency defense in the case of Roman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:23 am by admin
” The Ohio Supreme Court reviewed the sudden medical emergency defense in the case of Roman v. [read post]