Search for: "Sharp v. Thomas" Results 221 - 240 of 475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
’ Richard Thomas and Stephen Cushion in the Hoot have examined Buzfeed’s coverage of the recent UK election. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Court granted arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:49 am by Howard Wasserman
I wrote an analysis for SCOTUSBlog of Friday's opinion in Perry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
The Trump administration has thrown its weight behind Montenegro’s accession into the mutual defense pact, a move that has been met with sharp criticism from Moscow. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]