Search for: "Shepherd v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2021, 3:26 am
Bozzi v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
One of the Legislature’s stated purposes in amending Section 90.702 was “to adopt the standards for expert testimony in the courts of this state as provided in Daubert v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:04 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf 05/18/2007 United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:15 pm
:)Aqua Log Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:01 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:57 am
Most Ohio courts, for example, follow the 6th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
The WRBI has also used this shepherding technique with cougars, moose, big horn sheep, and wolves.Enter the government. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:49 am
Atlanta (police officer’s Facebook venting), Shepherd v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:08 am
In Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 23 the court held by a majority that a foreign national prisoner’s detention was unlawful for the periods in respect of which no review was carried out, contrary to Home Office policy, and that he does have a claim in tort for false imprisonment in respect of those periods. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
This ruling is quite similar to the Shepherd v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:20 am
Herzog (it is negligence per se to operate a vehicle on a state highway in violation of state safety statute requiring using lights). 3. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
* Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
Shepherd) a law review article concluding that the whole United States tort system is unjustifiable, specifically because it doesn't deter effectively. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Applying the principles set out by the Supreme Court in Fish & Fish v Sea Shepherd UK[1], Meade J found the former went no further than “mere facilitation” and thus no joint liability, whereas the latter amounted to assisting customers pursuant to a common design by working a method which would have infringed EP 572. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:36 pm
The November 22 opinion in Mississippi v. [read post]
