Search for: "Short v. Downs" Results 221 - 240 of 8,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by Stevie Phillips
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Alternative measures, particularly “notice and take-down” strategies, were unlikely to achieve anything more than short-term disruption of the target websites and accordingly did not provide an equally effective remedy for rights holders. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
It has been nearly ten months since the UK Court of Appeals handed down its judgment in Tracey v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 8:31 am by Chip Merlin
State Farm and its able trial counsel successfully appear to be fighting back in Falcon v State Farm Lloyds.1 This blog will be in several parts as we break down each section. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 6:43 am by Denise Sze
Our unique topography literally flows from ocean sands up into the mountains and down into deserts in a short span of distance. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:36 am by INFORRM
  In short, the SCA held that the EFF had unlawfully defamed Manuel (ie they published a defamatory media statement alleging he as corrupt and nepotistic without any legal basis at all), and granted Manuel declaratory and interdictory relief. [read post]
1 May 2019, 12:10 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Gallagher v Mercy Medical, a new malpractice case handed down this week by the Maryland Court of Appeals,  is the most recent decision from our high court in which a plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims against Mercy Hospital were barred under the “one satisfaction” rule. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case of Fisher v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in Cooper v Evans & Anor [2023] EWHC 2555 (KB) in favour of the defendants. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am by MBettman
On September 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]