Search for: "Short v. Hill" Results 221 - 240 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 10:10 am by Todd Ruger
Congress returns to work today after a five-week summer break, starting a short September session with hearings and votes on high-profile Department of Justice-related issues and a district judge confirmation vote today. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in June 2011, in the case styled, Lancer Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, Chemical Express Carriers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am by Marie Davoise
This post will provide a short description of the facts of the case and briefly set out the legal arguments put forward by both sides. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am by INFORRM
In AAA -v- Rakoff [2019] EWHC 2525 (QB) Mr Justice Nicklin set out the importance of claimants (and their lawyers) setting out a clear and consistent basis for seeking anonymity in civil proceedings. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Conor McEvily
Supreme Court: A Very Short Introduction. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
For Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons reviews two upcoming redistricting cases in the December sitting, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Imagine that the jury had collectively gone to the scene and reenacted the murder and concluded, yep, given the topography of the area, it'd have taken two people to drag someone up the hill and kill them, despite the fact that there was no evidence at trial at all about whether the area had hills, and convicted the defendant accordingly. [read post]