Search for: "Sierra Club v. DOE" Results 221 - 240 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The plaintiffs and appellants wereSavePanocheValley, Santa Clara Audubon Society and the Sierra Club. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am by Arthur F. Coon
  For example, Justice Franson’s concurrence appears to aimed directly at the California Supreme Court in connection with its consideration of another Fifth District CEQA decision addressing the adequacy of an EIR’s air quality analysis (and specifically its “correlation” of pollutant emissions to adverse known health effects), Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
   They have not responded publicly, but that does not mean a lack of awareness. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
As a May 2010 Sierra Club Canada Media Release so rightly states, we must "... protect adequate amounts of grizzly bear habitat and restrict the number of open routes and motorized access in other places. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Ministerial/Discretionary Distinction The First District helpfully elaborated on CEQA’s “functional test” for determining whether an agency’s project approval action is ministerial, rather than discretionary, in nature and therefore not subject to CEQA in Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
" (I say unfortunate because it allowed Carl Pope, President of Sierra Club, and others, the opportunity to attack Mr. [read post]