Search for: "Simon v. Simon" Results 221 - 240 of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2020, 8:30 pm by Patent Docs
Amanda Simons and Ravi Srinivasan of J A Kemp will consider the law surrounding dosage patents at the EPO and in the UK and the strategic questions which are raised by the Actavis v ICOS decision, and also look at how this issue is dealt with in other jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:04 pm by Anthony McCain
Adam Bonica, Adam Chilton, & Maya Sen: The Political Ideologies Of American Lawyers David Stein: The USPTO Strikes Back Joseph Herndon: Inline Plastics v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by Thomas Musmann
Simon Klopschinski rospatt osten pross Intellectual Property Rechtsanwälte Since the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:10 pm by Ruthann Robson
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 17 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales and Burrows) granted the defendant in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP permission to appeal the order of the Court of Appeal dated 15 May 2020 ([2020] 3 WLR 838). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:31 am by michael
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Geldof Metaalconstructie NV v Simon Carves Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 667 (11 June 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) The Judicial Authority of the Court of First Instance, Hasselt, Belgium v Bartlett [2010] EWHC 1390 (Admin) (11 June 2010) Mullally, R (on the application of) v HMP Lindholme [2010] EWHC 1356 (Admin) (11 June 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Dore & Ors v Leicestershire County Council & Anor [2010]… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Simon Klopschinski (Hoffmann Eitle) has published Der Schutz geistigen Eigentums durch völkerrechtliche Investitionsverträge (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2011). [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:22 am by Brian Cuban
  The Washington State Cyberbullying Statute reads as follows:     It is the case of Marta Lyall v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In order to meet the second part of the test, the person or body from whom disclosure is sought must be considered more than a “mere witness” (as set out at paragraph 54 of Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2013] EWHC 2119 (Ch). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:46 am by sally
A good illustration of this is the case of Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca De Crean [2012] EWCA Civ 156 which will be extensively covered in the talk to be delivered by Simon Forshaw on Confidential Information. [read post]