Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The scheme was part of a broader plan to falsely manufacture a victory for Trump by creating fake slates of electors in battleground states who would claim he had been the true winner. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:30 pm
(Slate).Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History blogger. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
In the coming term, the justices are slated to hear Moore v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The policies further stated that such MNPI should never be disclosed to others who may use that information to make trades. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
What that law is will differ from state to state. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
" Consider, for instance, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm
Moreover, petitioner's position that resignation and a promise not to seek future office clears the slate would encourage Judges to disregard the high standards of conduct they are bound to observe and "avoid the consequences of removal for cause by racing to resign"-- a practice rejected by this Court (Matter of Quinn v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 54 NY2d 386, 395). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
In 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:19 am
The case no. is 21 O 1970/22, and the first hearing (with the second one being a full trial) slated for February 15, 2023.The same division will hear another Apple v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:05 pm
In Reif v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm
I wrote this column for Slate on how Congress could nullify the North Carolina legislators’ claim in Moore v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In Badgerow v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
From Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 5:21 pm
The justices are already slated to hear three blockbusters after they return to the bench this fall: cases on affirmative action, religious exemptions from non-discrimination laws, and the authority of state legislatures to regulate elections. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The theory underpinning the case – the so-called independent state legislature doctrine – could also open the door to state legislatures sending their own slates of electors. [read post]
