Search for: "Smith v. Bell*"
Results 221 - 240
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz,… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Smith's speech on the Platform Law Blog and would also like to see other players "[e]mbrac[e] rather than fight[] digital regulation. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Bright v Town In the first judgment of the year, on 13 February 2017, the defendant obtained a rare order for summary judgment on Associate Judge Smith’s appraisal of the strength of qualified privilege and incurable defects in the plaintiff’s malice plea. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
My students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith worked on the brief. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Smith, 110 N.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
; Stewart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
Naturally, Judge Birss confessed, he was unaware of this relatively esoteric case when rendering his judgment in Apple v Samsung, and it’s likely an instance of multiple discovery. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio 2002); [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
" Rogers v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
Supreme Court's recent ruling in Bell Atlantic Corp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Smith, Jedediah D. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
We therefore conclude that the Smiths have not waived their request for attorney fees and that Hayes had ample notice that the Smiths, as the prevailing party in the litigation, would be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 4:37 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker Bell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:08 pm
Bies, and now Smith v. [read post]
