Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration" Results 221 - 240 of 751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
Even though Sineneng-Smith was aware that the program had expired, she continued offering her services. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court denied a motion to recuse Chief Justice Kelley in Grievance Administrator v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Jim Harper
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Royalty Board, 970 F.3d 418 (2020) Illustrates that the increased judicial skepticism of administrative lawmaking may well be coming for certain Copyright Office functions as well. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
 (The same generality-particularity issue applies as well to the bank records case of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Champions Real Estate Services – Real estate sales office stipulates to injunction, will stop “realtor” use: National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  That is simply not how the Court resolved free exercise claims in the generation preceding Smith. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by Joe Rich and Thomas Silverstein
Texas contends that the text of the Act must be read to prohibit only disparate treatment because of the Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm by Joey Fishkin
Smith wisely concluded was better left closed. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
Here is a complete list of the cases slated for argument in the December sitting, along with brief summaries for the cases not already mentioned above: Monday, November 27 Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]