Search for: "Smith v. New Haven"
Results 221 - 240
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Odom v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
But let’s not forget that the entire Smith v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
”An order-taking associate returns a half hour later: “Here’s a copy of Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Law schools hire somewhere between 150 and 350 new law professors per year, depending on how the economy is doing. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
March 27, 2010) (removal before service allowed forum defendant to be ignored).New Jersey: Bivins v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am
Smith’s new legislation H.R. 1932 purportedly intends only to jail dangerous criminals for life, but in practice would reach much further. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:25 am
Two decades before Smith, Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Medina, 10-8003, for which we haven’t yet been able to obtain the briefs; and in Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
(citing Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Hamtramck and Highland Park were at one time factory towns – and Hamtramck has the dubious distinction of the site of a terrible eminent domain for economic development land grab, Poletown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
(And if you haven't run out and do that. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Perhaps I’ve been wrong not to cover the MERS debacle in greater detail, but the reason I haven’t is that I view some of the issues related to MERS as kind of… well, pedestrian… not to put too fine a point on it. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Meanwhile, the IPKat's friend, dynamic small London-based practitioner Shireen Smith (Azrights) is offering an employment opportunity. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
Smith Zebras are not domesticable: Try to saddle me, will you? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
I thought Smith was out of the woods after the Supreme Court’s decision in December in State v. [read post]