Search for: "Smith v. New Haven" Results 221 - 240 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am by Graeme Hall
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  But let’s not forget that the entire Smith v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Mark Herrmann
”An order-taking associate returns a half hour later: “Here’s a copy of Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by David Bernstein
Law schools hire somewhere between 150 and 350 new law professors per year, depending on how the economy is doing. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
March 27, 2010) (removal before service allowed forum defendant to be ignored).New Jersey:  Bivins v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
Smith’s new legislation H.R. 1932 purportedly intends only to jail dangerous criminals for life, but in practice would reach much further. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Medina, 10-8003, for which we haven’t yet been able to obtain the briefs; and in Smith v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am by admin
  Hamtramck and Highland Park were at one time factory towns – and Hamtramck has the dubious distinction of the site of a terrible eminent domain for economic development land grab, Poletown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (And if you haven't run out and do that. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
Perhaps I’ve been wrong not to cover the MERS debacle in greater detail, but the reason I haven’t is that I view some of the issues related to MERS as kind of… well, pedestrian… not to put too fine a point on it. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Meanwhile, the IPKat's friend, dynamic small London-based practitioner Shireen Smith (Azrights) is offering an employment opportunity. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm by admin
Smith   Zebras are not domesticable:   Try to saddle me, will you? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am by Russ Bensing
  I thought Smith was out of the woods after the Supreme Court’s decision in December in State v. [read post]