Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The decision is here: Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
Rancho De Calistoga v City of Calistoga, 2015 WL 5158703 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It's Cruel. http://t.co/NaXa78aNWa -> Gallagher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 6:41 am
Wells also linked to the United States’ en banc petition in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
Following the Snowden revelations, Schrems challenged the level of protection in the USA against state surveillance with reference in particular to the PRISM programme under which the NSA under which it obtained unrestricted access to mass data stored on servers in the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:09 pm
The case is United States of America, ex rel., Blake Percival, v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Secretary Kerry criticized Chinese restrictions on navigation and airspace in the disputed South China Sea and stated that the United States “will not accept” these limitations. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Secretary Kerry criticized Chinese restrictions on navigation and airspace in the disputed South China Sea and stated that the United States “will not accept” these limitations. [read post]
A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA's Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
Today, in our landmark case Jewel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
v=k745w6GNAfs International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
On Friday, he stated that Iranian policy would not change against the “arrogant” United States, in comments that Secretary of State John Kerry today deemed “disturbing. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:00 am
Next Tuesday we are going to be in court in Washington, DC representing an American citizen who was illegally wiretapped by Ethiopia using Hacking Team rival FinSpy in Kidane v. [read post]
