Search for: "South Carolina Supreme Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
The decision of the Supreme Court to end the use of race in college admissions was not unexpected. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, held that admissions programs that consider race at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC) violate the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
”] From In re Martel, decided yesterday by the South Carolina Court of Appeals (Judges Paula Thomas, Stephanie McDonald, and Blake Hewitt): This case involves a family court judge's direct contempt citation against Appellant, attorney Lauren Martel. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Supreme Court struck down race-based affirmative action admissions plans at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Today, the Supreme Court ruled against Harvard and the University of North Carolina in cases challenging the legality of their use of racial preferences in student admissions. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The underlying theory behind the South Carolina Supreme Court has been a combination of a piercing the veil theory and conflicts of law analysis. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 6:02 am
Within the past two months, North Dakota, South Carolina, Nebraska and Florida all enacted restrictive bans on abortion. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to rule in his favor in business disputes, flew Justice Samuel Alito to a luxury fishing resort in Alaska resort on his private jet, a trip that would have cost Alito more than $100,000 one way if he had chartered the jet on his own. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Ron DeSantis Used Secretive Panel to Flip State Supreme Court” by Beth Reinhard and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) for MSN The post Wednesday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:56 am
., Docket No. 21-1431, June 20, 2023) (Order List), the Supreme Court remanded for further consideration South Carolina's appeal of a 4th Circuit decision that barred South Carolina from terminating Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:17 am
Supreme Court revives South Carolina Planned Parenthood defunding case (Andrew Chung, Reuters) Drugmakers aim to strike down Medicare drug-price negotiations at Supreme Court (Spencer Kimball, CNBC) Supreme Court considers recoil from landmark gun rights ruling (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) ‘Historic and significant’: key lawyer’s verdict on Alabama supreme court ruling (Sam Levine, The… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
A federal appeals court in 2021 struck down three of Alaska’s main contribution limits as a violation of donors’ First Amendment rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Fritz argues that the Court’s ruling that the state of Georgia could be sued in federal court by a citizen of South Carolina “generated widespread state interposition to resist the Court’s seemingly broad interpretation of a constitutional clause and ultimately resulted in the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
For better or worse, that may well be true, and only the most naïve can believe that the answers to that question have been provided (or even necessarily should be provided), in any uncomplicated way, by the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
As noted below, the First Circuit, applying the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:33 am
The Supreme Court ruling yesterday will likely add a Democratic seat in Alabama and could add more in Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, and Texas. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Ten years ago, Chief Justice John Roberts authored the Supreme Court’s opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
