Search for: "Southern v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 8,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2020, 7:16 pm by Gary Chodorow
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the cases of State of New York v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Johnson (RT) v R [2009] EWCA Crim 468 (17 March 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AM & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 219 (17 March 2009) Anglo Continental Educational Group (GB) Ltd v Capital Homes (Southern) Ltd (Rev 1) [...] [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:51 am by Steve Vladeck
Independent Living Centers of Southern California--a case in which, in a four-Justice dissent, Chief... [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
"* Here's the abstract:The exclusion of Southern representatives from Congress from December 1865 to the summer of 1868 raises two problems for the Fourteenth Amendment’s legitimacy: Congress (a) proposed the Amendment while excluding Southern representatives in 1866, and (b) required Southern states to ratify as a condition for readmission in 1867. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm by Securites Lawprof
On December 17, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment against Ken Okada, the last remaining defendant in SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2004, 5:01 pm
Southern Pacific Railroad Company that corporations were "persons" within the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore were due rights of equal protection under state law. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:26 pm by Ruthann Robson
Sessions, United States District Judge Katherine Forrest of the Southern District of New York ordered the immediate... [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:28 pm by Ruthann Robson
Selective Service System, Judge Gray Miller of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas found... [read post]
10 May 2003, 4:02 pm
Southern Pacific Railroad Company that corporations were "persons" within the terms of the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore were due rights of equal protection under state law. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Marvel Entertainment LLC et. al., Case Number 1:16-cv-02499 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Filed April […] [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:17 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
In that case, on Oct. 26, 2012, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment in favor of... [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by firstamendmentblogger
Deana Pollard-Sacks (Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law), Snyder v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
Jeffrey Bellin (Southern Methodist Univeresity) has posted Reconceptualizing the Fifth Amendment Prohibition of Adverse Comment on Criminal Defendants' Trial Silence (Ohio State Law Journal, forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]