Search for: "Speed v. United States of America"
Results 221 - 240
of 318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 4:30 am
This is especially true given surveys which show how prevalent drowsy driving is in the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States… [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm
Medical malpractice in the United States Five years after George Washington became president, America witnessed its first medical malpractice case. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Mass. 2010) is an exciting step forward toward true marriage equality in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
A comparison of the number of amicus briefs filed shows where most of the attention was. 54 briefs in Oil States vs. only in SAS. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
The missile flew a distance of about 4,600 kilometers (2,858 miles), with an altitude of some 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) and a top speed reaching Mach 17 – meaning 17 times the speed of sound, according to Japanese officials. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am
Having now, as a judge myself, experienced disagreement over matters far less consequential than the presidency of the United States, I have even more regard for how she navigated that challenging period. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am
When the cellular phone emerged as a consumer product in the 1980s, it operated in 800 MHz frequencies, for which the FCC initially gave away two licenses for 40 MHz of spectrum in each of the 306 market areas in the United States – one to a wireless provider and one to a wired provider. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Priority would be given to faster speeds. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:24 am
In the 2015 case United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am
” Book sits in a chair that was once occupied by none other than Miles V. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:05 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, voted against the stimulus package, stating he did not feel it was good for America. [31] He referred to the plan as a "political stimulus package" [rather] than a real package that would impact our economy in any significant way. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
(PEN America), the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), and the Student Press Law Center (SPLC), arguing that liability would violate the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
United States (1935), which until recently limited this sort of thing. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
In support of this position, the IPR petitioner relies on the Supreme Court’s holding in Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
