Search for: "Spitzer v. Spitzer"
Results 221 - 230
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Heck v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.1-3.2)/2.2 (1.0-4.7) Lidegaard et al,[12] 1998 Case-Control 1.44 (0.83-2.50)2.19… [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
" Finally, I read the Declaration of Robert Spitzer, which is Exhibit E of the California Attorney General's Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court's Order of September, 26, 2022, Duncan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Welcome to theMartin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
November 2015 (Punkt 1.6) wurde er angesichts der Umstände des Falls als nicht anwendbar betrachtet.Der Wesentlichkeitstest hat auch Eingang in die Richtlinien für die Prüfung im EPA gefunden (siehe Abschnitt H-V,3.1 in der derzeit geltenden Fassung vom November 2016: "Ersetzen oder Streichen eines Merkmals aus einem Anspruch"), allerdings wurde in der englischen Fassung das "may not" der Entscheidung T 331/87 hier durch ein "does not"… [read post]
