Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California" Results 221 - 240 of 3,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Other commentary focuses on Fisher v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
By contrast, the opening up of marriage in California will undoubtedly have a much larger impact. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:52 pm by Sean Hanover
California, 505 U.S. 437 (1992); Drope v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:17 am by Anna Christensen
At the BLT, Marcia Coyle follows up on the Court’s recent decision in Doe v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:42 pm by Howard Bashman
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court upholds California law on humane pork sales; Proposition 12 bans selling products derived from sows that don’t have at least 24 square feet of space and the ability to stand up and turn around in their pens. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:15 pm
This opinion is a good candidate to go up to the California Supreme Court.Not that the Court of Appeal is necessarily wrong. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Carter has granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the pending lawsuit of Smelt v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:05 am by trichard
Significant Action by the California Supreme Court The California Supreme Court has declined to take up on appeal the Guzman case. [read post]
The bill also would expand coverage of California’s school activities leave (Family School Partnership Act, Labor Code Section 230.8) to include day care facilities and cover child care provider emergencies, and the finding, enrolling, or reenrolling of a child in a school or day care, and would extend protections to an employee who is a step-parent or foster parent or who stands in loco parentis to a child. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:50 am by Amanda Rice
Plata, the California prison overcrowding case, continues. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
Buono, which asks whether a cross erected as a memorial within a California national park is constitutional. [read post]