Search for: "Standard v. U. S"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm
Ils sont propriétaires de deux immeubles en Italie, l'un à U.________ (prov. de Parme) et l'autre à V.________ (prov. de Latina). [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:35 am
In Fierro v Yellen 2022 NY Slip Op 32959(U) August 31, 2022 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 523796/2021 Judge: Ingrid Joseph, a case that wended its way through Kings Supreme, and on to the Second Department, everyone in the proceedings take fluid positions on whether there was fraud, whether there was a good class action and on Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
On this point, the 2003 Rule Release states as follows: Our PRA estimates do not include any additional burdens or costs that a company will incur as a result of having to obtain an auditor’s attestation report on management’s internal control report because the [Public Company Accounting Oversight Board], rather than the Commission, is responsible for establishing the attestation standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act itself requires companies to… [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:57 pm
This analysis generates a new legal test and demonstrates the test’s superiority. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
For simplicity's sake, we will focus on three of these. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
(2) Behar v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
Amuchastegui's ending reference to Fidel Castro's famous "History Will Absolve Me" provides the proper level of irony to the 2023 assessment. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
Supreme Court decides West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
But that’s not always the case. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Thus, if the matter at hand challenges professional standards, as in u/redpanda891’s case, turning down the file and/or referring it to another lawyer may be an appropriate countermeasure. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
‘”[U]nless the ordinary experience of the fact-finder provides sufficient basis for judgingthe adequacy of the professional service, or the attorney’s conduct falls below any standard of due care, expert testimony will be necessary to establish that the attorney breached a standard of professional care and skill”‘ (Estate ofGinor v Landsberg, 960 F Supp 661, 672 [SD NY 1996], affd 159 F3d 1346 [2d Cir 1998], quoting Greene… [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Last post, we discussed Gad v Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 34357(U) December 20, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156841/2021 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am
Slip Op. 31243[U], 15 [N.Y. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
Upholding the venue selection clause in Instagram’s TOS. * Chilutti v. [read post]
