Search for: "Starr v. Starr" Results 221 - 240 of 950
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Fourth District Upholds CEQA Class 32 Infill Exemption For Small Residential Condo Project On Environmentally Sensitive Lands As Consistent With San Diego’s General Plan Despite Failure To Meet Recommended Minimum Density
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Holden v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Trump Impeachment and the Question of Precedent
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
Polls in November 1998 showed that almost 30 percent of Republicans in the country opposed impeachment—almost 40 percent believed that the Starr investigation on which the Republican case for impeachment was based was too partisan. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
“ROG Won: A CEQA Wars Story” – Third District Holds Geothermal Energy Project EIR’s Rejection Of Proposed Mitigation Measures For Significant ROG Fugitive Emissions Impact Violated CEQA Where No Substantial Evidence Showed Measures’ Infeasibility
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Russel Covington, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How To Frame Someone For a Drug Offense
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
Over twenty years ago, in the case of Starr v. [read post]
Orlando Criminal Defense Attorney Blog - http://www.orlandocriminaldefenseattorneyblog.com/
New Illinois Supreme Court Trigger Rule for CGL Personal Injury “Offenses” Could Have Costly Consequences for Policyholders
10 Dec 2019, 6:51 am by Michael S. Levine and Kevin V. Small
The Illinois Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sanders v. [read post]
Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog - https://www.huntoninsurancerecoveryblog.com/
Revisiting Criminal Obstruction of Justice in the Impeachment Inquiry
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
Wittes also notes that none of the prior special prosecutors in matters that potentially touched presidential obstruction—Leon Jaworski, Lawrence Walsh and Kenneth Starr—apparently thought that the clear statement rule hindered the application of the obstruction statutes to the president, even when the matters concerned the presidents’ Article II powers. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Leaving Bad Law “On The Books”: Supreme Court Denies Depublication of CEQA EIR Project Description Case That Promotes Piecemeal Litigation
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853, which quoted Lewis v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Week That Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
[Josh Blackman] What happens if the Chief Justice cannot serve at the Presidential impeachment trial?
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
[Walter Nixon v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Depublication of CEQA EIR Project Description: Detail Case Sought by CSAC and League of Cities
20 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Klocke’s Ongoing Viability: Whether the TCPA’s Statutory Changes Have Resurrected Its Applicability in Federal Court
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Jesse M. Coleman
” Starr v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
First District Affirms Judgment Upholding MND for Rural Sonoma County Winery Project, Holds Unsubstantiated Expert Opinion Fails to Support Fair Argument of Geologic, Erosion Or Groundwater Impacts
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Impeachment Proceedings Against U.S. Presidents
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Path-Takers and Way-Makers
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
After only a year at DOJ, Roberts was on the “fast track,” which was how his former colleague Kenneth Starr put it in a congratulatory note (82). [read post]
The Faculty Lounge - http://www.thefacultylounge.org/
Fourth District Rejects Coastal Act/CEQA-Based Challenges To Commission’s Certification of San Diego Port Plan Amendment As Time-Barred For Failure To Join Indispensable Parties Within Limitations Period
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CDCR’s Inaction In Failing To Maintain Historic Former Hotel Not A “Project” Subject To CEQA, Holds First District
17 Sep 2019, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Urban Land Uses And Project Design Components Fungible For CEQA Project Description Purposes As Long As Maximum Possible Environmental Impacts Are Disclosed And Analyzed? Second District Doesn’t Think So, Holds Controversial Millennium Hollywood Project EIR’s “Blurry” Project Description Violates CEQA
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com