Search for: "State Bar v. Superior Court" Results 221 - 240 of 2,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am by Steven B. Katz
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007), cert. denied sub nom Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Oral arguments were heard last week in a 2015 lawsuit filed in Massachusetts Suffolk County Superior Court challenging state laws allowing unions to make political contributions while barring corporations from doing the same. [read post]
30 May 2010, 1:02 pm by Scott Koller
  The Insurance Corporation of New York discovered this holding the hard way when the California Court of Appeal published Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm by Richard Frank
  The Monterey County Superior Court invalidated the measure, concluding that it was preempted by contrary, longstanding state law. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am by admin
Virginia State Bar a dozen times and highlights its quote that a state bar’s status “as a state agency for some limited purposes does not create an antitrust shield that allows it to foster anticompetitive practices for the benefits of its members. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  This holding conflicts with the holding and reasoning of the Third District Court of Appeal in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:40 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Here is a LINK to the Tort Talk post on the trial court decision.The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed after finding that issues of fact precluded the entry of summary judgment. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Giorgi held that the measure violates a state law that bars localities from regulating health care professionals who are also regulated at the state level. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Eastern District relied upon Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Vazquez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Daniel E. Cummins
While the trial court judge had ruled that the Defendant had to be served at her place of business for venue to be proper in Philadelphia, the Superior Court instead found that Rule 402(a) "clearly states that service may be effected by 'handing a copy to the defendant.'" According to an article on the case by Amaris Elliott-Engel in the June 9, 2011 Legal Intelligencer, the case of Silver v. [read post]