Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
The Supreme Court in Pascale v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:30 am
Foster of the San Bernardino Superior Court in California issued a three-page minute order granting summary judgment for the plaintiff in Davis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Lac de Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Superior Court Of California, 137 S. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:33 am
Thus, many courts have held that if the advertisement generally asserts that a product is superior, but does not explicitly refer to scientific tests as support, the plaintiff still carries the burden to affirmatively prove that the claim is false, i.e., that the defendant’s product is equal or inferior to the plaintiff’s. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
The third was the Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Board v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
The proponents of intelligent design believe it is a scientific theory that stands on equal footing with, or is superior to, current scientific theories regarding the evolution and origin of life. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:43 am
In Ontario v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:34 am
In Ontario v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
He said: Apart … from the question of contract …, it is said that in revenue cases there is a doctrine that the Court may ignore the legal position and regard what is called “the substance of the matter”, and that here the substance of the matter is that the annuitant was serving the Duke for something equal to his former salary or wages, and that therefore, while he is so serving, the annuity must be treated as salary or wages. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Equals Three, Ltd. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The court addressed the disputed items and ordered the husband to pay the wife an equalization … Terasen Gas Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
