Search for: "State Board of Law Examiners v. Brown" Results 221 - 240 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
In Foreign Policy, Keith Johnson examines whether or not OPEC’s recent power play over worldwide oil prices can do what it is intended to: kill the US oil boom. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
For reasons rooted in the Supreme Court’s narrow conception of the Commerce Clause in the nineteenth century, trademark rights arise under state law – for the most part, state common law. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 7:39 am by and
While it hasn’t generated nearly the level of public attention as cases involving marriage equality or voting rights, North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am by Eric M. Fraser
Next week, on October 14, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Unsuccessful attempt by a business to erase unflattering message board comments. * Judge v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board examines difficulties associated with ensuring Syrian chemical weapons disarmament. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Overview of the No-Fly List The ACLU’s lawsuit, Latif et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
  In 1994, the Federal Reserve Board interpreted the savings clause as providing only for “very narrow” preemption of state law. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
The first concerned infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark, which reads'In proceedings before it the Office shall examine the facts of its own motion; however, in proceedings relating to relative grounds for refusal of registration, the Office shall be restricted in this examination to the facts, evidence and arguments provided by the parties and the relief sought'.In a nutshell, the Court stated that the Board… [read post]