Search for: "State Ex Rel. Head v. Head"
Results 221 - 240
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 7:52 am
State ex rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Illinois ex rel. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
The Ohio Supreme Court in State Ex Rel. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
” This part of Blacker was never quoted, much less explained, by the majority or concurring opinions in the Bush litigation.In any event, if the case for ISL is to be built on Supreme Court authority, twentieth-century decisions—decisions post-Blacker—strongly undercut ISL.Consider first the 1916 case of Ohio ex rel. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
This time the case was U.S. ex rel. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
That last case, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
” Relying on U.S. ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
” State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 8:59 pm
Ciccia ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
"] From Justice Brian Hofstadt's opinion Wednesday in Kaplan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:03 am
But off the top of my head, I don't know what those records would be. [read post]
