Search for: "State Farm Ins. Co. v. United States" Results 221 - 238 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
David is a co-author of the book Patent Prosecution, to be published in 2011 by Oxford University Press.] [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
(See Temporary Maintenance Guidelines Worksheet, revised January 31, 2012 at www.nycourts.gov/divorce/TMG-worksheet.pdf or Temporary Spousal Maintenance Guidelines Calculator, revised January 31, 2012 at www.nycourts.gov/divorce/calculator.pdf)  Beginning January 31, 2010 and every two years thereafter, the income cap increases by the product of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) as published by the united states… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
But where the 2003 version of Circular A-4 had a lengthy section addressing “Ancillary Impacts” (co-benefits and countervailing risks), the proposed 2023 version has a shorter Section 7(g) addressing “Additional Impacts. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]