Search for: "State ex rel. Justice v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2023, 9:56 am by luiza
In a major victory for honest citizens, on June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:06 am by Ben
To succeed upon the issue before the Court of Justice the Claimants would have to persuade the Court of Justice that there was no discretion on the part of the Member States as to the choice of test for the computation of harm (as to which in the Judgment I set out fully the relatively extensive case law of the Court indicating that such a discretion did in fact exist), and, that the only lawful test was the licensing test. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
Four justicesJustice Antonin Scalia, joined by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Clarence Thomas – agreed in Vieth v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Courts Hold Implied Certification Theory Valid Under California False Claims Act In San Francisco Unified School Dist. ex rel. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:30 am by National Indian Law Library
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:Spirit Lake Tribe of Indians ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan, and Jackson, like Justice Barrett, thought that the reflection on what comes next was unnecessary. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Here I want to focus on two sets of questions.The first was an exchange between Justice Barrett and Marc Hearron, the lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who represented the private-party plaintiffs in the first argument, Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
  Petition for a Writ of Certiorari The government begins its statement by citing United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Perhaps that relative lack of attention is warranted, if (as many believe) it is highly unlikely a majority of Justices will be sympathetic to that challenge. [read post]