Search for: "State of Georgia v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
(The United States takes no position on the second issue.) [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
This past year the United States Supreme Court dealt one of the most devastating blows to consumers yet, allowing big corporations to cheat Americans out of millions of dollars. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:43 am
” Also arguing in favor of vacatur and remand was the United States, which is party to two treaties with similar conditional clauses: Article 11.18 of the 2011 United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and Article 1121 of the 1992 North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
Shelnutt's trial began, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
While Mason’s resentencing was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided Hurst v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:04 pm
I’ll link to the United States’ opposition to the TRO in a subsequent post. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:06 am
Supreme Court case of Troxel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm
United States (2019). [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
” Greater Georgia Amusements, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:23 pm
" In Atkins v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:48 am
At the heart of their suit is whether they are "lawfully present" in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
United States (2019) The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Gamble vs. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am
In 2007, after an arbitration in the United States, a panel of three arbitrators issued a final award. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:09 am
In its decision in Baze v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:21 am
In Heng et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:38 pm
In a case out of Georgia, Presley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court… [read post]
