Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v… [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:39 am by Tia Sewell
So far, more than 50 countries have ordered doses of the Sputnik V vaccine. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Montana Department of Revenue, in which the High Court held that states cannot bar families participating in generally available student-aid programs from selecting religiously affiliated schools for their children. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:57 am by John Elwood
United States v. [read post]
Moreover, his votes in the COVID-related cases from this past summer, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
Eleven states (Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Oklahoma and West Virginia) explicitly limit the total number of ballots an individual may deliver, notarize or authorize on behalf of voters. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:14 pm by Chris Castle
The United States of America, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, and the States of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas, acting through their respective Attorneys General, bring this action under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The respondents in the case are Muslim men who lawfully immigrated to the United States. [read post]