Search for: "State v. $18,000"
Results 221 - 240
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2010, 8:04 am
Develop Don’t Destroy, Inc. and Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council (Brooklyn), Inc. v Empire State Development Corporation and Forest City Ratner Companies, LLC In these Article 78 proceedings, petitioners are challenging a modified general project plan for the Atlantic Yards Project in Brooklyn, a massive, publicly subsidized, mixed-use development project which will include an 18,000 seat sports arena for the New Jersey Nets and 16 high rise… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:12 pm
That’s what the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
That’s the lesson of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
Stuart v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:09 pm
Wong, and also as stated in Chandi v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Some say it could be the biggest ruling since Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm
"Meanwhile, "Let Us Vote" in Iowa has started lobbying that state's legislature to approve an MPA that would overturn Varnum v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 pm
LUV organizers seek to lobby the state legislature to approve a "marriage protection amendment" that would give voters opportunity to overturn Varnum v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
– 6,000 Mid – £6,000 – 18,000 Upper – £18,000 – 30,000 For a fuller and very helpful discussion see Usefully Employed’s post on the subject. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 3:16 am
Supreme Court's complete decision here: Lane v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
(Merrill v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:14 am
Though Judge Kavanaugh sided with the other two judges in the D.C. circuit Appellate court in its their recent ruling in the case of SoundExchange, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
June Carbone and I have written in Red Families v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 3:52 pm
Outside of this definition, the only reference to the term “environment” is in the purpose provision of Part V.0.1, which states that the purpose of Part V.0.1 is to provide for the protection and conservation of the “environment”. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
Matter of Do Not Destroy Brooklyn v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:12 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
Normally in a study involving disease prevention, the sample size has to be much larger than 18,000 and for much longer than two years. [read post]
