Search for: "State v. Alston" Results 221 - 240 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On December 13, 2010, Judge Levin of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion supporting entry of a compulsory non-suit in favor of a property owner after ruling that a defect in the sidewalk that was only 5/8 of an inch was a trivial defect as a matter of law in the case of Alston v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On December 13, 2010, Judge Levin of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion supporting entry of a compulsory non-suit in favor of a property owner after ruling that a defect in the sidewalk that was only 5/8 of an inch was a trivial defect as a matter of law in the case of Alston v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Kara OBrien
Kevin Miller, a Partner with Alston & Bird and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this post discussing the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Golden Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:16 am by John Hochfelder
Here are two of the cases that the attorneys cited which the judges could and should have discussed in explaining why they sustained the jury's $1,000,000 verdict for pre-death pain and suffering: Alston v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:11 pm by Dwight Sullivan
And audio from United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Alston v State of New York, Ct. of Appeals, 97 N.Y.2d 159 The doctrine of sovereign immunity generally shields a state from suit absent its consent. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alston (Kan. 1994), Matter of Providence Journal Co. (1st Cir. 1986), and State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:37 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Chancery Refuses to Apply Choice of Law Provision in Investment Bank's Engagement Letter From Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird: In Shandler v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
  Unsurprisingly, DirecTV filed its petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc on August 9th, seeking rehearing of the Cappuccitti v. [read post]