Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 221 - 240
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
If she chose to remain in Austria, her children could remain. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am
"Imminence in Refugee and Human Rights Law: A Misplaced Notion for International Protection," International Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019)- Preprint version of article.Lessons Learned: The Longitudinal Effects of Austria’s Labor Market Integration Policies on Bosnian Refugees (SocArXiv, April 2019)- Preprint version of article. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
The law enforcement agency settled in Raza v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Vestal, Religious State Constitution Preambles, 123 Pennsylvania State Law Review 151-190 (2018). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
Abfertigungskasse v GRADBENIŠTVO KORANA The CJEU published last week a judgment on a request for a preliminary ruling by the Vienna Labour and Social Security Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP: Contact Martin Krause or Michael Born Austria Currently there is no proposal similar to Germany’s Brexit-StBG (see above). [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am
Austria, concerning an injunction preventing further depiction of a politician where a photo of his face was plac [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
The day before the FTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm
In Zehentner v Austria (2009) ECHR 1119; Brezec v Croatia (2013) ECHR 705, (2014) HLR 3; Zrilić v Croatia (2013) ECHR 921) the ECtHR had found, at least in principle, that someone at risk of losing their home should have a right to an independent determination of the proportionality of that action, even where the landlord was a private party. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
In this sense, closed national systems of protectable works (as is the case in Europe of the UK, Ireland, and Austria) would unlikely be compatible with EU law. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
As regards the latter, prosecution was brought under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 (R v Penguin Books Ltd [1961] Crim LR 176). [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Austria, 13470/87, 20 September 1994; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 17419/90, 25 November 1996; İ.A. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
In relation to inadmissible evidence the Court stated that the Board of Appeal rightly upheld the Cancellation Division’s decision on whether the applicant had adduced evidence of Red Bull’s actual knowledge of the use of the contested mark in Austria. and rejected the Asolo’s argument.Similarity between alcoholic drinks and energy drinksThe second plea, related to likelihood of confusion, which requires similarity between both the marks at issue and the class of… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:26 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question that the Italian Supreme Court had to address in Ralph v Mediaset and Others, decision 14635/2018 [Katpat to Valentina Borgese for the heads up and the text of the decision]. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
In Zhang v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
The Court prepared this step in Simon v. [read post]
