Search for: "State v. Aver" Results 221 - 240 of 933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 1:21 pm
Kemble, the Superior Court noted in language that is arguably dicta, that a claim of recklessness on the part of a defendant amounts to an averment regarding the state of mind of a defendant at the time of an accident and that, under express provisions of Pa.R.C.P. 1019(b), such averments as to the state of mind of a party may be generally pleaded in a personal injury complaint. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court rules on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Such an allocation, it avers, "would be irreconcilable with this Court's cases," which state that a recidivist enhancement is not a separate punishment from the underlying offense but rather constitutes a "stiffened penalty" for the underlying offense. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
Insured also averred, regarding the claims, that Insurer was not prejudiced by any alleged delay in notification. [read post]