Search for: "State v. Banks"
Results 221 - 240
of 15,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:54 am
” [1] Conservatorship of Geerdes v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 4:03 am
Ortiz and United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm
For example, in Sander v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
Palm Beach Blood Bank, 143 F.3d 1407 (11th Cir. 1998). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings.Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings.Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
In Beach Orangethorpe Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:11 am
It is styled, MacIntire v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm
BrazilGazeta do Povo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
