Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 221 - 240
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 6:45 am
Joseph Singer of Harvard Law School, “almost all state laws currently make exceptions for blighted property. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council (2023) EWCA Civ 80 – the Court of Appeal on residual diminution in value/blight in nuisance cases (here Japanese knotweed) – it is not ‘pure economic loss, and is recoverable in damages. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
As the lawyers took aim at overturning Plessey [sic] v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:47 am
Planet Aid v City of St. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 3:37 am
’” Huntley Power v Town of Tonawanda, 2023 WL 3912499 (NYAD 4 Dept.2023) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Commercial developments – In the case Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
The majority in Kelo emphasized that nothing in its decision prevented states from placing restrictions upon the exercise of eminent domain specifically through state statutes or constitutional interpretations as to what qualifies as a "public use. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:08 pm
Schiller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 1:03 pm
Schiller v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:45 pm
Comparison of the 2021 Program v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
In an often-criticized 2005 decision (Kelo v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
On January 7, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division published a decision in Borough of Glassboro v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:33 am
Doesn't Brady v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm
” (Citing Gentry v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
