Search for: "State v. Books" Results 221 - 240 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am by Richard Pierce
Richard Pierce Thomas Merrill’s book, The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State, is timely in several ways. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book. [read post]
5 May 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The defendant … Bhasin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Summaries of selected recent cases are provided each week to Slaw by Maritime Law Book. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 5:24 am by Carl Neff
The recent decision by Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves in the case of Grand Acquisition LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am by Karina Lytvynska
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 5:38 am by Katie Bart
Ironically, Totenberg pointed out, Roberts wrote the dissent from Ginsburg’s 5-4 opinion four years earlier in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As Hoffer details Hamilton's arguments for the supremacy of treaty law over state law, the significance of Rutgers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The book addresses a pressing issue at the intersection of intellectual property (IP) and investment law: how shall IP rights be treated in investor-state dispute settlement? [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
I always thought that those "X-Ray Specs" you saw advertised on the back of comic books were fake. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:15 am by Giles Peaker
The district judge had correctly noted that the White Book 2015 states [3A-1621.1] … payment of a deposit into the scheme more than 14 days (or 30 days after the Localism Act amendment) after its receipt, but before a tenant commences proceedings, does not come within s.214(2)(a), and the court cannot make an order… [3A-1627.3] … if a landlord is late in complying with the dual s.213 obligations, but does so before any s.214 proceedings are brought by the… [read post]