Search for: "State v. Briggs" Results 221 - 240 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Finally, Juror B's email states that the only other juror who began deliberations not already inclined to convict Roy was the juror who failed to show up on Monday and who was replaced by the alternate. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Briggs and City of Chicago v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
” In a case law context, the five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch) (“Benchdollar”). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:59 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Kerr, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt, and Lord Thomas. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]