Search for: "State v. Cass"
Results 221 - 240
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
"[5] In its recent decision on punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
Part V extends the mini minds framework to the domain of public law. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
Wayman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The same blog has a comment on decision of the Italian Supreme Court on damages for violation of image rights, Scatti rubati: notorietà non significa rinuncia alla riservatezza (Cass. 1875/19). [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
It probably only reflects the position as it would have been found to exist at common law (see Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB) – in which qualified privilege was found partly on the basis of the journal having an “exclusive readership”). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:44 pm
(Kacper Pempel/Reuters) In D Magazine Partners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
[Decision citation: Cour Cass, Civ 1, 6 July 2017, SFR and others v Association of cinema producers and others, No 16-17.217, 16-18.298, 16-18.348, 16-18.595, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100909 - available here in French language)]Legal context of the decisionIPKat readers will remember from the CJEU's Telekabel decision that ISPs were not held liable for infringement but were nevertheless expected to cooperate with rights enforcement measures within the… [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
The authors in the series have included truly remarkable scholars, including not only the individuals you mention above, but also Cass Sunstein, Pam Karlan, Lee Bollinger, Mark Tushnet, Michael Klarman, and on and on and on. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Cass, Cass & Associates (June 25) Presidential campaign documents seldom read like carefully crafted scholarly work. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Cass, Motive And Opportunity: Courts’ Intrusions Into Discretionary Decisions Of Other Branches–A Comment On Department Of Commerce V. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
This is a cerebral palsy resource guide for the State of Indiana. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:01 pm
”Morrissey v. [read post]
