Search for: "State v. Chen"
Results 221 - 240
of 643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The City established, prima facie, that the alleged untrue representations underlying those causes of action are the same as those underlying the breach of contract causes of action (see Stangel v Zhi Dan Chen, 74 AD3d 1050, 1052). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The City established, prima facie, that the alleged untrue representations underlying those causes of action are the same as those underlying the breach of contract causes of action (see Stangel v Zhi Dan Chen, 74 AD3d 1050, 1052). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:47 pm
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas On October 12, 2011, the California Court of Appeal in Nicholas Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:13 am
” State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The designThe case concerned is Chen v OHMI - AM Denmark (Dispositif de nettoyage), T-55/12 of 25 April 2013 and can be retrieved here. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:07 am
Plaintiffs in another class action, Chen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 2:25 pm
By Eric Goldman Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Horton and the Southern District of New York’s decision in Chen-Oster v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Edited by Enrico Bonadio & Chen Wei Zhu. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:27 am
Does Lewis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:52 am
“Vacating the dismissal order is consistent with the public policy of this State to dispose of cases on their merits (Harwood v Chaliha, 291 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 2002]), and upholds the principle that a trial court’s power to dismiss an action sua sponte should be used ‘sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances'” (Cooper v Broems, 214 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ray v… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:44 am
In Chen v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm
In his post Tariq discussed the background and findings of Carter v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:54 am
by Dennis Crouch Align Tech v. [read post]