Search for: "State v. Chestnut"
Results 221 - 240
of 241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
Frequent meetings with the Title V/CSHCN program, the state ICC, the Academy of Pediatrics' Medical Home project, as well as CHIP, and insurance employee benefits managers ensure strong, respectful partnerships. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:07 am
United States, a case involving the interplay between multiple federal criminal statutes, state law treatment of convicted offenders, and interpretive chestnuts such as the Absurd Results canon. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:40 am
Does 1-11 pending in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, directed at students of Oklahoma State University.In Artista v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:51 am
In the Oklahoma State University case, Arista v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
In Interscope v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
In Arista v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 2:55 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
Seven (7) North Carolina State University students named as "John Does" have joined together, in LaFace v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
The newest decision out of Massachusetts on this topic, McGillivray v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:38 am
Thomas (Renamed Capital v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
You may recall that in Interscope v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:35 am
The case is Emhart v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
The implied license question reminds me of the old, pre-1976 Act chestnut, Hemingway's Estate v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:00 pm
Litigation Release No. 20021 - SEC v. [read post]
