Search for: "State v. Christopher R."
Results 221 - 240
of 1,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2020, 11:29 pm
The impact of Huawei v ZTE Since the seminal 2015 CJEU case of Huawei v ZTE (the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies, EU:C:2015:477)) the importance of a harmonised approach to FRAND across EU member states has become obvious. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm
In State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm
In State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 2:15 am
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, December 5, 2019, Chen, R.). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs, and Christopher A. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
Are the UPCA and the ratification laws compatible with the State’s duty to protect constitutional identity? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:43 am
For instance, in Imar v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:01 am
United States and Abrams v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Christopher Majdi, Director of Valuation & FMV Services at Premier, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Christopher Majdi, Director of Valuation & FMV Services at Premier, Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Golden Elite Patent Law, Paul R. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 1:06 am
Filing and examination fee discounts extended to joint applicants A 30% reduction for the filing and examination fees is available for entitled applicants such as SMEs, natural persons and universities from an EPC contracting state having an official language different from one of the official languages of the EPO. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am
Finally, the Board did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider an untimely argument made by the petitioner (Henny Penny Corporation v. [read post]
